Haven’s Eric Balfour Q&A

NUP_139932_0771.jpgEric Balfour, star of Haven which airs Fridays at 10:00 pm on Syfy, participated in a conference call Q & A to talk about his character in the show and about last Friday night’s episode.

Can you tell us about the process the prosthetics for the episode “Ball and Chain” and how was it to work with it?

Eric Balfour: Yes. You know, it was actually really crazy. Even in prepping for it we were so under the gun because we were in the middle of shooting another episode.

And it came down to just even at the beginning they had to fly me from where we shoot the show in Halifax on a redeye to Toronto at like – it was 11 o’clock at night. And I flew in and I had a few hours sleep and then I went to the visual effects artist’s studio and they started doing the face mold and cast.

And, it’s that weird process where you have to, you know, they put a bunch of plaster on your face and alginate. And you sit there with a little straw coming out of your mouth and trying not to get claustrophobic. And so we had to do it really, really quickly. But they had a few days to prep and then they showed up on set with these different prosthetic pieces.

And, we’ve been talking about it for a few days before about how the aging would take place and the different stages of ages I would go through the first one being a light prosthetic and mostly just makeup use. That would age me about 20 or 30 years.

And then from there you go to about 75 or 80 years old and then to about 95 and then all the way up to, you know, well we hope to about 100 years old because Duke’s going to live a long time or so we thought. But it was a pretty intense process. I mean it was about four or five hours every day in the makeup chair.

But to be honest it was so helpful once you started getting into the prosthetic because we had talked about the different physical attributes that come along with the way that your body can, you know, degenerate over time and the physical abilities you lose and the joint dexterity and your voice changes.

And but the minute we started putting on the prosthetics it makes that whole process so much easier. It was crazy. It was a little scary at times because you’re looking at yourself going is this really what I’m going to look like in 30 years, 40 years? But in some ways it was interesting because some of it was very correct. You could see wow, that’s what my face is going to do. Given the nature of that it’s not, you know, reality. And it is still an artistic, you know, conception of what you look like.

It was interesting to see even the makeup artists themselves, the visual artists, they’d look and go oh you know what? Now having spent a little more time looking at the way you use your face these two wrinkles won’t really happen to you, but you’re going to get a wrinkle here not there. Unless of course you’re terrified of having them and have been looking up supplements to prevent them (such as these beverly hills md reviews). But the majority of people will find themselves with some before the age of 50, and so it was really fun to play with that.

And then we went through a long conversation about facial hair. Because there was this sort of – a question of well okay so if you’re aging really quickly would the hair continue to grow at the same rate and if you didn’t shave it would you have it? So as you probably have seen in some of the pictures I have at one point this really sort of long goatee, this wispy long Fu Manchu goatee… because we just – we decided to play on the idea that well if you’ve got facial hair and he doesn’t cut it would just keep growing. And then eventually, you know, as you got really old you would just start to lose your ability to grow hair and that would all fall away.

But it was intense. I mean I had to show up hours before everybody on set and sit in the makeup chair and try to keep myself awake all day. And then it’d take about an hour and a half after everyone left at the end of the day to get it all off.

And we did like three or four straight days of that. And it was intense but those guys were amazing. And it was just – it’s so much fun to like – to be perfectly honest, I haven’t gotten a lot of opportunities to dive into that sort of heavy a character development as far as totally taking on a different character.

And although it was a character I play it’s at an age that I’ve never played or at a physicality that I’ve never played. So it was really fun as an actor to get to really put on a character, you know, not just a maybe a little bit of an accent but to really – you know, my favorite actors growing up were guys like, you know, Gary Oldman and Daniel Day Louis and Sean Penn and guys who really were magical, Meryl Streep, were incredible actors at creating completely different chameleon characters.

And Gary Oldman being really one of my biggest inspirations because he, no matter how big he takes a character and how out there it seems it’s always so realistic. It’s always so believable in some ways. And I’m just – I’m fascinated by the work that he does and it’s always something that I wanted to do. So even getting that opportunity even if it’s only for a few days was really special to me.

How important is the online community to the show’s success and why is it important for you to interact with your fans online?

Read more

Jon & Pamela Voelkel Blog Tour & Interview

As a stop along the way on Jon & Pamela Voelkel’s Blog Tour, I was able to ask the authors several questions about themselves and their recent Egmont release – The Jaguar Stones Book One: Middleworld. Of all the ancient cultures, how did you choose the Mayan culture to research and develop your story? Jon … Read more

Fact or Faked Premier and Q&A!

Fact or Faked

Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files premiers tonight (Thursday, July 15th) on Syfy. SciFiChick.com was able to participate in a conference call with stars Ben Hansen (team leader and former FBI agent), Bill Murphy (lead scientist and investigator) and Executive Producer John Brenkus.

Here are some Q&A highlights from the call:

Today, someone with their own software can fake UFO and paranormal events. How much do you scrutinize to determine if you’re investigating a hoax?

Bill Murphy: …If you kind of know the software and you know how it’s done, spotting it really isn’t too difficult. There’s some pretty sophisticated material out there. And a lot of times it isn’t for the intention that somebody would create it just to deceive others.

But sometimes you have an artist that wants to put his work out there and gauge the response of the public as to you know how good he is modeled the object. And that’s okay that people do that, you know they may create UFOs, but there are UFO’s over Haiti models that you know kind of sparked this whole new wave of irregular shaped UFOs have been a lot of fun to look at.

But you know you can spot things. It’s how much time somebody wants to take in creating it is up to that person. Most people that put them out there are going to be students or they’re going to be you know somebody that’s trying to break into the field.

And they will spend a reasonable amount of time to create it and there will be flaws that you can spot whether its flaws in the composite or flaws in you know shadow placement. You know there are things that you can kind of pick up on fairly quickly.

What’s the challenge with the tools you have in the field to spot something that could be faked?

Bill Murphy: Okay, well one of the criteria that we have… is a strong eye witness. And so if there are multiple witnesses, and in some cases that we’ve investigated, you know many, many dozens of witnesses. And that makes for a really strong case because you’re talking about something that is not just a piece of video, that a service with the person who – where they shot it but something that you know physically is there that other witnesses have come forth and said they’ve seen.

And there could be 911 calls or news reports or you know whatever it takes, reporting an object or a sighting or some sort of event that’s happened. And those are strong cases, so the video is bolstered by multiple eye witnesses or if there are limited eye witnesses then there’s a credibility you have to look at.

You know what are the motivations for this video being posted and if we get there we really don’t pull any punches to try to replicate the video. So the challenges are something that I don’t think we’ve had stop us. Generally we try to stop at nothing once we’re there to demystify the video. I mean we stop at nothing. Really extreme stuff and it’s a lot of fun.

John Brenkus: Yeah, let me just jump in real quick. I think in terms of you know thinking that someone just created the clip you know on their computer, that’s part of the debate and discussion, well is it someone who just created an effect. Because we’re all at this point, the audience is pretty savvy at being able to spot it. So the three criteria that we have set up, is the footage actually compelling? You know, does it have credible eye witnesses and it is something that can be testable eliminates a lot of cases that you say well it was just created on a PC.

I think you know the people behind this show and the audience look at these clips in an intelligent manner. I think that what you’ll see is the cases that we investigate aren’t ones that you just automatically say well it must be CG. Because it doesn’t get that far in our process if you can eliminate it that quickly.

Ben Hansen: And then let me add to what Bill’s saying. When we do come up against those cases that are very difficult, either they’re done very well in CG, we’re just not sure, that’s where I like to use my experience and focus on the poster or the witness who shot this video or provided this photo.

Read more